This is daft

March 2nd, 2010

Apparently Mr Speaker’s other half, Mrs Sally Bercow, is running for a seat in the house. She wants to be a Labour MP. God only knows why, but it doesn’t matter to me if she wants to run for the Monster Loony Party.

Mr Speaker is a Conservative MP. Because he is also Mr Speaker, he has to be impartial, at least in the house.

Mr Speaker gets what is known as a Grace and Favour house, because to do his job he really has to be in the house. Tradition does not allow a holographic representation to be put up on the wall with an auto-order-order device when the troughsnouters start to get lairy.

It is not unreasonable for Mr Speaker’s wife and kids to cohabit in the house. In this context, they live at home.

I could run for a seat if I wanted to. I don’t. But, if I did, I could run from a house, a boat, a shed, a rented office or from the top of a tree.

Mrs Bercow can’t, apparently. “Chaps” have decided that she can’t. Presumably the partner of Mr/s Speaker has never wished to run in the past.

So, if she wants to run, and it is her right, she has to move out, with or without her family.

That is just plain daft, in my most humble opinion.

If you have a different opinion, and you are of independent mind, I’d like to know.

Just Do It …

July 30th, 2009

… with apologies to Nike.

I have found The Answer.

When you’re weary, feeling small; when tears are in your eyes, this will dry them all.

Find a busy place, preferably somewhere like a church, or a library, or an open-plan office. Maybe a job centre (plus). Marks & Spencer. Anywhere inappropriate will do.

Cup your hands to your mouth, like a megaphone.

Holler like you’re making the mating call of a bull moose (if you’ve never before heard the mating call of a bull moose, imagine the sound of a ship’s foghorn combined with the urgency of a baby’s cry and the anguish of Oliver Reed when he has his goolies wedged between two bits of wood and whacked with a sledgehammer in the 1971 film “The Devils”, also starring Vanessa Redgrave (stop waffling - Ed)

Continue with this holler for a few seconds, gradually getting louder, until you are sure that nobody save the profoundly deaf have missed the performance.

Then, in one deft movement, finish the call with “aaaaa-choo” and immediately cover the mouth as if to stifle the crying sneeze.

Pretend that it was unavoidable, and wear a satisfied smirk.

Trust me, it worked for me yesterday. I couldn’t help myself.

Normal Service Could Be Resumed

July 15th, 2009

There are, broadly speaking, two sorts of people in this country. This country, by the way, is England. It is not South Scotland. It is the one which, sadly, is being eaten away by a bunch of zealots despots self-satisfied attention-seeking megalomaniacs … there must be a word … hubris-ridden lunatics … ahh, that’s better.

The two sorts of people are the ones who’ve had enough (that includes me) and the others who are on the gravy train or are mentally deranged, or both.

If you are one of the latter kind, then please feel free to comment on this blogette, I will probably delete your comments because you are clearly either too stupid or too selfish to have them published. However, if you are one of the former, then please read on, as there is a formula by which I think things could be restored to normality, or at least some semblance of it.

If you are in the middle of the road or sitting on the fence, then take a gander at this which will give an indication of how jumpy and jittery the powers-that-be are. Or look at this:

Sharp Edges

It isn’t real. Of course it isn’t. Nor is this:

Blank

This is, though, on all the locks on the river Nene, courtesy of the Environment Agency, who are only doing what they’re told:

Too Many

And so was the one which was written in Welsh, and translated as “I am not in the office at the moment …” rather than the intended “No entry for heavy goods vehicles …”. It’s still on Auntie Beeb at time of writing, and not dated April 1st here

Perhaps April Fools’ day in Wales is our Hallowe’en.

So, which camp are you in?

Had enough? Then here’s what to do. Firstly, find someone who is intending to vote for this bunch again. They are quite easy to spot, and you can find them almost anywhere (although there seem to be more in the North, Scotland, Wales and so on). Look for these telltale signs:

  • standing outside a job centre
  • knuckles dragging on the ground
  • wearing school uniform and pushing a pushchair or being followed closely by small child or children
  • going into, or coming out of, a public building such as a council office, court house, police station etc
  • wearing a red rosette

Having identified your target, ask them if they are intending to vote for the offending bunch. If they reply in the affirmative then attempt to sway them by offering cohesive and coherent arguments (do not use big words as this will confuse them). Ask them the question again. If they have seen the light, then wish them well, and congratulate yourself on a job well done.

If they cannot be persuaded by reasonable means then, because at the moment the vote is only witheld from serving prisoners, the mentally ill and most animals, I guess the way forward would be to shoot them.

Ponzi

June 29th, 2009

A Ponzi scheme, as run by good ole boy Bernie Madoff (pronounced made off, as in with the money), is one where “investors” are encouraged to buy shares in the scheme with a promise of a good return. There is no investment at the end of the day, the money goes into a big pot from which the scheme organisers help themselves.

New investors’ money is then used to pay dividends on the original investors’ money.

Early investors are delighted because they get the return they were promised, which means that new investors are easy to get.

Eventually, however, the money runs out, as there are no new investors.


A government pension scheme is one where civil servants are enticed into the job by the prospect of a gold-plated pension at the end of service. There is no investment at the end of the day, the money goes into a big pot from which the scheme organisers help themselves.

New employees’ money is then used to pay out on the original employees’ pensions.

Early employees are delighted because they get the pension they were promised, which means that new employees are easy to get.

Eventually, however, the money runs out, as there are so many employees now on pensions that it is impossible to employ enough new ones to pay for them.


Bernard Madoff knew what he was doing, got away with it for not quite long enough to ensure his death before he was found out, and will go to jail for several offences including money laundering, fraud etc.


The government knew what they were doing, got away with it for not quite long enough to be unseated in the next general election, and will now get pensions for life plus cash handouts for losing government and their seats.

Conclusion: life is fair? I think a good jury would get Madoff off the hook.

My Manifesto - Education

June 23rd, 2009

The first in a series of manifesto items for the rootcause party (which doesn’t actually exist, but should).

EDUCATION

The three R’s would come back, immediately. Reading, wRiting and aRithmetic.

Anyone, that means anyone, declaring that it is not important to be literate and numerate will be discarded. If this person happens to be in a position of authority he should be immediately sacked and given ten years of roundabout-planting duty outside primary schools.

Any other form of education starts once the three R’s have been mastered. There is no point educating people in what comparative religions are, or what they are for, nor training them to be anything beginning with ps or ph, nor indeed anything else, until they have a grasp of the principles from which all of these other things will start to come.

Streaming, the mechanism whereby people of differing abilities are separated, will be brought back. There is a fundamental reason for this: all people are not born equal. The expression is “all people are born equal in the sight of God” and God doesn’t care whether they can read, write, add up or even walk in a straight line, if at all. But education, correct me please if I’m wrong, is the tool which prepares one for what lies ahead, which is life. Life is not free unless you are a bird, fish or animal of any kind, wild or domesticated. Humans don’t naturally co-exist as a philanthropic society, they vie. They argue. They aspire. All are not equal because, if they were, they would all be CEO’s of banks and all earn ten million pounds per year. People who can’t do the three R’s will not get very far up the ladder which one must climb to get to the CEO’s luxurious office on the top floor.

However, nature proves not to be capricious, it seems. In my humble job up the middle of the pecking order I meet people from the top and the bottom alike (mainly in the smoking shelter, thanks to Bliar). The ones at the top are often struggling, often scared, often pole turtles (see pole turtle picture below if you are not familiar with the term), and some are quite unhappy. The same applies to the people at the bottom. So in effect they are the same, apart from the fact that some of the people at the bottom could do the jobs of those at the top, but not vice-versa.

A typical Pole Turtle

A typical Pole Turtle

Education should not try to protect the weak. If it does, it is merely raising the level of pride thus increasing the depth of an inevitable fall.

I remember being very upset when (much) younger; I had made a circuit board for a radio control for a model boat. The chap who kindly supervised me, a next-door neighbour called Max, said to me upon first inspection of my finished article “I see art is not your strong point.” He then did it again, as it was pretty much beyond repair. Art is not my strong point, although I subsequently qualified as an electronic engineer.

My point is this: had Max said “Wow! Fantastic, lovely job.” I would probably have taken him at his word, sunk the boat, and become a really bad artist (which I am). So: teachers, governments, people, anyone with ears; reality. It hurts, but nowhere near as much as falling from the dizzy height to which you’re elevating your victims.

Not everyone should, or wants to, go on to further education. It is counter-productive in the wrong circumstances. It does not teach you how to live on your own, and do your washing, and manage on a budget. Living on your own, doing your washing and managing on a budget teaches that, and does not need to be interspersed with teaching and exams.

Educate to ability. Educate to aspirations, as long as those aspirations are achieveable. If you or little Johnny want to be doctors, then be doctors, if you can cope with a lot of hard work, sleepless nights, pressure, watching people die while you look on helplessly. If you or little Johnny are what we used to call ESN (I don’t know the PC term for it so ESN it is), then you won’t be doctors, but then nor will you aspire to be.

I know tree surgeons who make more money than real surgeons, have a lot more fun, have very little stress and can still function after a night on the tiles. They are still saddened when a patient dies though.

Lastly, I moot this: no formal education has ever prepared me to recognise an opportunity when I see one. It should be a subject on its own. Perhaps they do that now, and if so I would love to know.

Please feel free to call me a rightist/leftist/racist/nazi/pinko or whatever, it doesn’t bother me much and I just love a good argument.

The passing of the book

June 16th, 2009

I notice today from the Bee Bee Sea webby neurons that the humble book is to be phased out by Mr Arnold Shwarznegger, rubbish actor and governor of California (search for BBC A Textbook love affair)

I agree with this. I understand it too, because everything anyone could ever want is available on the interweb now.

Here is some useful information, so that when schoolchildren and even researchers google (yes, it’s a verb) for something they will find it here.

1. A shark is not a fish.
2. A woman has one more chromosome than a man, and it is the “Y” chromosome.
3. The hare has exactly the same DNA as a human making it indistinguishable from us (apart from the extra two legs).
4. Llamas are used to herd sheep because they are capable of independent thought, unlike sheep.
5. The wolf is the only wild animal with an opposable thumb.

There. All conveniently stored in one small space, useful not only for ‘A’ level study but also for compiling pub quizzes. In the olden days, Messrs Monty Python had a spoof book of lies, written by the Hackenthorpe brothers and allegedly published by Slater-Nazi, as I seem to remember dimly. The interweb seems to have gleaned some of its information therefrom, especially in the environs of Wikipedia.

I suspect that if the web site used by the students and researchers was run and written by people who know at least something about their subject, that would be fine. But that would be, to all intents and purposes, a book, wouldn’t it? Maybe not a paper book, handsomely bound, but a source of information.

Instead of sitting comfortably and perusing the book, the student could sit up straight, strain his eyes, burn his thighs, get Repetitive Strain Injury whilst scrolling his mouse wheel, and a whole schoolful of students could then in a single evening  consume about the same power as a jumbo jet flying from London to New York.

Excellent plan, Mr Shwarznegger.

But, as usual, I have a better one. Below the line down there, copy the text until the line even further down there then, using your favourite text editor, such as Notepad, paste it in. Repeat on separate pages for each test then print it, and you will have created your own book.


Eleven-plus exam, some years ago:

In the following word pairs, one letter can be moved from the first word to the second word leaving two different words. The letters must not be otherwise arranged and both new words must be real words.

SCARF : RAIL

GUILT : POND

BLIND : SAY


English Language ‘O’ Level paper, 2008:

In the following word pairs, one letter can be moved from the first word to the second word leaving two different words. The letters must not be otherwise arranged and both new words must be real words.

SCARF : RAIL

GUILT : POND

BLIND : SAY


If any English teachers would like to use any of this material they are more than welcome.

Beware that any comments added to this post may not be ratified and as such it is advised that users of this material should do their own research to validate them, using such tools as Google and Wikipedia which can be found on the interweb and used freely.

Toller Porcorum, like Haddock

June 15th, 2009

There will be four (4) people in the whole of the world who have any idea of what the title means, and I’m not sure about at least three (3) of them.

Toller Porcorum is a mixture of Olde-Anglo-Saxon toller, meaning valley, and latin porcorum being the genitive (plural) of pig. According to the internet, so it must be true, the Toller is the old name of the river which flows through the village of Toller Porcorum, which has since been named the river Hooke, but my friend Rosalind Buttered-Crumpet informs me that it means “valley” and so “valley” it is.

So I spent the weekend in the valley of the pigs.

“Are there pigs?” I enquired.

“Not a one.” retorted Rosalind, authoritatively.

One does not argue with Rosalind.  An acclaimed (and bronzed, she told me not to omit) erstwhile writer of many things not limited to cordon-gendarme cookery, she knows. Had she not made the decision to spend time in the real world, in a Felicity Kendal stylee, she would be a rather good blog writer.

Anyway, we had spent some considerable time discussing the merits of the American (mis)use of words such as “leverage” as a verb, management-speak and its uselessness and, more importantly, the word “like” as a hesitation mark. Like, er, like, um, ah. And the general concensus is that it had close to zero value in any context apart from that of its original meaning, for instance when introducing a simile. But more than simile, it introduced a smile. And a conundrum, as you will see.

Sunday brought us to a publick house known as the Spyway, a smugglers pub in Askerswell. I can recommend this pub on a nice day as there is an ample garden with attractive water feature and, if you ask, you can get an ashtray too. Inside if wet is not so attractive an option as the bar is small. Cosy is a word which would also describe it adequately, but small is more accurate.

Into the second pint, mid-discussion into the colouring of the bee orchid (don’t ask), the young lady-in-waiting approached our table and interjected “Excuse me, did you order like haddock?”

Conversation stopped. “Like haddock? No, not us.”

She left, bearing what was presumably like haddock, to seek those who ordered it, leaving us to work out how “order like haddock” should be punctuated.

I have since tried going into the shop to order some Marlboro, like haddock. It is not easy, you have to mouth the words in a haddocky way, as haddock (so far as I can gather) can not, or will not, speak. You can’t point like a haddock, as haddock’s extremities are designed for navigating the salty depths, not for pointing. It is like being paralysed in a foreign country whose language you know not wot. Of. I assume that you can’t order like haddock, you can only really order like a human.

I have tried Joe’s Fish Restaurant. “Have you anything like Haddock?” I asked. Apparently there is nothing like haddock, although obviously cod would be more like haddock than, say, cottage pie. So I assume that there is nothing that, technically, is like haddock, and conclude that the young lady must have meant “Did you order, like, er, um, haddock?”

My message to young (and old, alike) is this:

“Like”. It is a versatile word, being a noun, verb, adjective, preposition, conjunction, adverb, even a verbal auxiliary and not least a suffix, in the case of haddock-like.

It is not a substitute for er, em, like, arrrgh.

And my message to those lovely people who explain from positions of apparent authority that it doesn’t matter if we spell properly, use our native language properly, and pick up junk American langauge faster than we can build a new McDonalds is this:

Yes, it bloody well does. Like.

Paper

May 8th, 2009

Paperwork. There’s a place for it. It is not, however, in a builder’s merchants.

My youngster, being a youngster, jumps on the bed. They all do; if you think they don’t, then yours do it when you’re not looking. Anyway, owing to the slats being made of inferior Eastern European pine, and having knots in them thicker than the slat itself, they break.

Replacement is simple, you go to the builder’s merchants, and ask for a couple of nine hundred mil lengths of seventy by twenty softwood, my good chap.

The merchant then taps away at a computer for about five minutes, asks if that’s all you need today, you reply in the affirmative.

Out come three sheets of paper which he pulls from the printer. He asks you for £2.12 which you hand over, then out comes a receipt which he staples to the other three pieces of paper, handing them to you with the instruction to go to the yard and give this paperwork to the sawman.

You do this, then the sawman takes the paperwork, goes into the office where he stows one sheet, taking the rest to the sawbench. He gives you your replacement slats, followed by the pieces of paper that you gave to him only a minute ago.

You leave the builder’s merchants and, whilst drinking the pint in the pub next door, you get to thinking what the point of all this really is.

It is because it is necessary. Without the paperwork nobody would know that the two replacement slats had been sold. The six people working in the back office would have nothing to do, and be assured that for every piece of paper that you get there will be another one produced in the back office, which can then be stamped, passed to someone else, filed, copied, filed again and eventually sent to the accountants. From there, the paper will go to the auditors, and then all will know that the treasury pocketed 31.8 pence for the coffers.

All that tapping, printing, filing and there is 31.8p. Eventually, if enough kids break enough beds, that 31.8p will multiply. If you multiply it by 100, it will be £31.80. That’s 100 kids breaking two slats each, or 200 kids breaking one slat.

If you multiply it by 1,000, that’s 200,000 slats broken, then you make £31,800. And 1,000 again, that’s 200 million slats and you have £31,800,000. Thirty one million pounds. Wow! And by 1,000 again, 200 billion slats and you have just enough to throw at a failing bank

And my point is?

This: all of that effort, everyone doing everything right, by the book, following the rules, blindly following the prescribed procedure. Years and years of it, like ants in a nest or bees in a hive, blindly doing what they do because that’s what they do. And at the end of it all, it goes down a big hole. Swallowed up, the nest bulldozed and the hive ransacked.

And I am guessing that the amount thrown at the bank, the bank who didn’t do the paperwork properly and didn’t follow the rules, was not calculated as £31,801,962,421.24 but was just plain old-fashioned thirty billion pounds.

In builder’s merchant terms, that’s 2 million years of tapping, printing and filing.

Please write and explain why this is OK. Please?

“It’s what makes the world go round” is the wrong answer. Ask an ant, or a bee.

Evenin’, all!

May 6th, 2009

I think I’m turning into a grumpy old man.

This might be because I’m getting older, or more grumpy, or both. I’ve always been a man and so has my wife, Brian.

I don’t read the Daily Mail because the Sudoku is rubbish and because I am sent links to the online sillier stories on a daily basis, and I’m paranoid about missing emails, so I don’t use a spam filter, so I get them whether I want to, or not, the latter being the case.

I felt the need to set up this iBlog. I don’t expect anyone to read it, nor discuss it, and I care neither whit nor jot whether anyone does or not. It makes me feel better when I hit the Publish knob. Not that I have done so, yet. It’s my first blog; I expect when I do hit the tit the whole thing will vanish in a myriad of flashing lights and a puff of smoke.

But I shall carry on regardless.

Every day for ages I have read either a newspaper or the Bee Bee Sea webnews, and every day for ages I have found something to be grumpy about. Not just because the silly government has yet again managed to crawl out of the alligator pit smelling quite unlike alligator shit, but because what I’m reading is six-fingered-windowlicker mentality.

Today’s startling revelation is that the Plod are offering an escort home from the cash machine. Apparently anyone can use it, you just ring up Whitehall 1212 and ask for a policeman, and one will turn up in a Dixon of Dock Green style, sporting a blue pointy hat and greeting you with a cheery ‘Evenin’, all!’ He will then escort you home with your cash and see you safely inside, and he won’t even ask for a tip.

Now, I have nothing against marketing types in general, but this smacks of spin-gone-mad. The police force is understaffed, overworked and underfunded. They don’t really need extra duties such as this. And I could go on for hours about what a waste of public money it is, why don’t they go and catch criminals, and so on. But no. My grumpiness is because everything is so illogical.

Supposing that Mrs Oldlady is petrified that her fifty quid shopping money is going to be taken off her in a street brawl by a hooded gunman. There’s nothing wrong with giving her a police escort through the streets of Tavistock to her cottage by the sea. But what, exactly, is she going to do with the cash? Perhaps put it under the mattress, where it will earn her slightly more interest than the bank offers. Perhaps put it in the biscuit tin to pay the milkman, the window cleaner, and the boy scout who comes for bob-a-job week (does that still happen?)

More than likely, though, the shopping money will be for shopping. Ocado don’t take cash on delivery. nor do the T word, nor Sainsbury’s. So, more than likely, she will be going to the shops. With no police escort this time.

See the silliness? I do so enjoy being put right so if you can see any other logical, sensible explanation which I have missed in my ignorance, please feel free to post. There is probably a Comment, Post, or similar button up there or down there. I don’t know, I haven’t done a blog yet.

[presses Publish knob ...]